Author summary
4% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Owen Jarus results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 280 hits . Analysis detected 2,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,426 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,014 of 6,353 authors). This Owen Jarus is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Owen Jarus
Author details
Total words: 6,426
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst