Speaker summary
65% 4 analyzed articles/videos 175.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donald Tusk results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 96.375 hits . Analysis detected 620.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 175.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,907 of 28,364 speakers). This Donald Tusk is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Donald Tusk
Speaker details
Total words: 175.667
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 16.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos175.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 45.3% 45.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 20.1% 20.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.2% 29.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 26.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst