Speaker summary
59%7 analyzed articles/videos166.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donald Trump Jr. results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Ad Hominem, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 408.047 faulty-reasoning hits from 166.667 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,686 of 28,364 speakers). This Donald Trump Jr. is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Donald Trump Jr.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.4% percentile
9.0% BS Score7 analyzed videos166.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate