Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 1,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Carless results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,843 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,843 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,853 of 6,316 authors). This Will Carless is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Will Carless
Author details
Total words: 3,843
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst