Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video138.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominque Jones-Johnson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 184.058 faulty-reasoning hits from 138.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,883 of 28,364 speakers). This Dominque Jones-Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Dominque Jones-Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 138.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.9% percentile
18.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos138.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.6%38.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos