Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dionte Wilkins results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.5% saturation with 80.476 hits. Analysis detected 186.476 faulty-reasoning hits from 140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,503 of 28,364 speakers). This Dionte Wilkins is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Dionte Wilkins
Speaker details
Total words: 140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
15.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos140 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.5%57.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.6%6.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos