Speaker summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 552.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delia Ramirez results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 195.192 hits . Analysis detected 1,891.649 faulty-reasoning hits from 552.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,494 of 28,364 speakers). This Delia Ramirez is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Delia Ramirez
Speaker details
Total words: 552.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 7.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos552.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 35.3% 35.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst