Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These De Palma results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Composition/Division as the most egregious example at 51.6% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 77 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,174 of 28,364 speakers). This De Palma is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
De Palma
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
49.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 48.4%48.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 48.4%48.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 48.4%48.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Composition/Division: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/DivisionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos