Speaker summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Tangipa results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 65.9% saturation with 166.732 hits. Analysis detected 866.423 faulty-reasoning hits from 231 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,746 of 28,364 speakers). This David Tangipa is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
David Tangipa
Speaker details
Total words: 231
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
17.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos231 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 65.9%65.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.3%28.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 19.6%19.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 65.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos