Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Street Station results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Nature, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 91.3% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 376 faulty-reasoning hits from 183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,620 of 28,364 speakers). This David Street Station is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
David Street Station
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠59%David Street Station (selected)42%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 183
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
41.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos183 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 91.3%91.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 73.8%73.8%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 91.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 73.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos