Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Davi Ottenheimer results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.2% saturation with 29.16 hits. Analysis detected 106.998 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Davi Ottenheimer is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Davi Ottenheimer
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
34.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.2%57.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 48.8%48.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 32.8%32.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos