Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darrick Jacob results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.3% saturation with 64.875 hits. Analysis detected 195.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,582 of 28,364 speakers). This Darrick Jacob is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Darrick Jacob
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
15.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.3%50.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos