Speaker summary
⁠40%5 analyzed articles/videos251.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darline Graham results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 427.917 faulty-reasoning hits from 251.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,599 of 28,364 speakers). This Darline Graham is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Darline Graham
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
9.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos251.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.2%8.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos