Speaker summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darcel Clark results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 78.9% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 259.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,603 of 28,364 speakers). This Darcel Clark is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Darcel Clark
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 61.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
46.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos61.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 79.0%79.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 72.5%72.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.0%34.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 79.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 72.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos