Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny Funt results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Personal Incredulity, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40.5 hits. Analysis detected 178.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Danny Funt is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Danny Funt
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos