Speaker summary
66% 4 analyzed articles/videos 262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny Citrinowicz results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 129 hits . Analysis detected 852.497 faulty-reasoning hits from 262 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,407 of 28,364 speakers). This Danny Citrinowicz is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Danny Citrinowicz
Speaker details
Total words: 262
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 16.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos262 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 25.7% 25.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 25.7% 25.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 31.0% 31.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 31.5% 31.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 0.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 0.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst