Author summary
97%3 analyzed articles/videos294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samia Nakhoul results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 1,111 hits. Analysis detected 7,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,020 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (537 of 6,382 authors). This Samia Nakhoul is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Samia Nakhoul
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
92%Samia Nakhoul (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,020
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510091.6% percentile
7.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.1%26.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 15.9%15.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 36.8%36.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.8%28.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 10.9%10.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.9%7.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 36.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 10.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate