Speaker summary
⁠40%2 analyzed articles/videos117.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Sider results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 242.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 117.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,814 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Sider is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Dan Sider
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 117.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
15.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos117.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos