Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Landes results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 4,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,368 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Landes is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Emily Landes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
50%Emily Landes (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,708
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos