Speaker summary
81% 3 analyzed articles/videos 182.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Patrick results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 96 hits . Analysis detected 715.044 faulty-reasoning hits from 182.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.3% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,186 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Patrick is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Dan Patrick
Speaker details
Total words: 182.333
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.8% percentile 18.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos182.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 30.8% 30.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 35.0% 35.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 38.0% 38.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 22.9% 22.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 27.3% 27.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst