Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Becca Lower results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,682 hits. Analysis detected 12,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,048 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,332 of 6,365 authors). This Becca Lower is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Becca Lower
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
64%Becca Lower (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,048
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate