Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruce Parker results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,756 hits . Analysis detected 12,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,089 of 6,628 authors). This Bruce Parker is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Bruce Parker
Author details
Total words: 12,144
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst