Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video202.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Kashian results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 63.75 hits. Analysis detected 245.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 202.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,094 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Kashian is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Dan Kashian
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 202.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
18.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos202.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos