Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos337.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cynthia Cox results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 830.872 faulty-reasoning hits from 337.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,376 of 28,364 speakers). This Cynthia Cox is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Cynthia Cox
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 337.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
12.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos337.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos