Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culver City officials results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 83.6% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,492 of 28,364 speakers). This Culver City officials is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Culver City officials
Speaker details
Total words: 67
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos67 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 83.6%83.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 83.6%83.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 83.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 83.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos