Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Craig O'Donoghue results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, In-Group Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 68.7% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 281 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,896 of 28,364 speakers). This Craig O'Donoghue is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Craig O'Donoghue
Speaker details
Total words: 134
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
30.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos134 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 68.7%68.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 36.6%36.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 68.7%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos