Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casey Martin results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,936 hits . Analysis detected 27,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,137 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,765 of 6,416 authors). This Casey Martin is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Casey Martin
Author details
Total words: 32,137
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score15 analyzed articles32.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst