Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Councilmember James Gomez results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 76.7% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,624 of 28,364 speakers). This Councilmember James Gomez is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Councilmember James Gomez
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
55.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 76.7%76.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 76.7%76.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 76.7%76.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 76.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 76.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 76.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos