Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation Law Foundation results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 70% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,876 of 28,364 speakers). This Conservation Law Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Conservation Law Foundation
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 70.0%70.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 70.0%70.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 70.0%70.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 70.0%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 70.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 70.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos