Speaker summary
35% 6 analyzed articles/videos 560.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Common Dreams results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 208 hits . Analysis detected 958.295 faulty-reasoning hits from 560.5 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,925 of 28,037 speakers). This Common Dreams is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Common Dreams
Speaker details
Total words: 560.5
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.1% percentile 9.9% BS Score6 analyzed videos560.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 22.7% 22.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 22.7% 22.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 19.3% 19.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst