Fix Our Senate | Organization | Common Dreams ⁠85%

7/2/2026, 1:15:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 72.6% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,418 of 21,568 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the article peer group.

Fix Our Senate is a coalition of more than 70 organizations who are joined together to ensure that the promises of progress are not blocked by the filibuster. 
40 Reproductive Rights, Health and Justice Organizations Demand the Senate "Stop Defending the Filibuster in Our Name" 
Fix Our Senate Responds to Census Release and Implications 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 7.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 5.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 72.6%Common Dreams: 17.4%Framing Effect72.6%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 45.2%Common Dreams: 0.6%Status Quo Bias45.2%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 2.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Common Dreams: 20.6%Negativity Bias27.4%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 2.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 3.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.5%Common Dreams: 1.5%Recency Bias14.5%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 6.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 5.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 45.2%Common Dreams: 3.2%False Dilemma45.2%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 3.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 2.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.4%Common Dreams: 18.9%Appeal to Emotion27.4%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 3.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 4.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 27.4%Common Dreams: 1.9%Unattributed Quote27.4%This article: 27.4%Common Dreams: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection27.4%This article: 59.7%Common Dreams: 17.2%Biased Writer Voice59.7%This article: 45.2%Common Dreams: 8.6%Indoctrination45.2%This article: 72.6%Common Dreams: 17.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias72.6%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Common Dreams: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

62 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech54writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Common Dreams • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Common Dreams

0%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Politically Left Leaning B-83.3 ptsWriter: 83.3%Common Dreams: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-68.5 ptsWriter: 68.5%Common Dreams: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-51.9 ptsWriter: 51.9%Common Dreams: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-31.5 ptsWriter: 31.5%Common Dreams: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-31.5 ptsWriter: 31.5%Common Dreams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.