Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Filibuster results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 4,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,481 of 16,558 topics). This Filibuster is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Filibuster
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,052
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.3%16.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.0%10.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos