Speaker summary
51% 3 analyzed articles/videos 619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Collin Cherubim results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 110.265 hits . Analysis detected 811.034 faulty-reasoning hits from 619 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,605 of 28,364 speakers). This Collin Cherubim is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Collin Cherubim
Speaker details
Total words: 619
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos619 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst