Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coconut Creek Fire Rescue officials results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,603 of 28,364 speakers). This Coconut Creek Fire Rescue officials is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Coconut Creek Fire Rescue officials
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos