Author summary
19%3 analyzed articles/videos698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linnie Supall results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 809 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,094 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,945 of 6,628 authors). This Linnie Supall is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Linnie Supall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
41%Linnie Supall (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,094
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate