Speaker summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos193.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleta Mitchell results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.5% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 325.569 faulty-reasoning hits from 193.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,801 of 28,364 speakers). This Cleta Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Cleta Mitchell
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos193.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 26.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos