Speaker summary
69% 4 analyzed articles/videos 278.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clem Delangue results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 113 hits . Analysis detected 674.982 faulty-reasoning hits from 278.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 16% (22,644 of 26,865 speakers). This Clem Delangue is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Clem Delangue
Speaker details
Total words: 278.5
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 12.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos278.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 29.7% 29.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.2% 18.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst