TechCrunch44%
Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash 27%
By Lucas Ropek25%
7/10/2026, 11:55:07 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 559 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.5% and a BS Rank of 27% (15,100 of 20,515 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the article peer group.
Meta has axed a controversial feature that allowed users to modify photos from public Instagram accounts using AI.
The feature, which was rolled out earlier this week along with a batch of other AI tools, “missed the mark” and is no longer available, according to the company.
Earlier this week, Meta announced Muse Image, a new AI image generator built by Meta Superintelligence Labs, its dedicated AI unit.
Meta promoted one feature that allowed individuals to generate images by @-mentioning public Instagram accounts that they wanted to reference.
The feature, which wasn’t designed to alert a user if their photos were used in this way, prompted immediate backlash.
TechCrunch wrote its own guide on how to disable the feature.
Now Meta has reversed course.
The company issued a blog post Friday announcing that it was removing the feature.
Puck News founding partner Dylan Byers was the first to share the company’s decision .
“Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way,” the company posted on its blog.
“We’ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it’s no longer available.”
TechCrunch reached out to Meta for more information and will update this article if it responds.
Since its integration with social media platforms, AI has been misused with wild abandon — often to generate naked images of female celebrities .
Platforms have attempted to mitigate this trend, although the guardrails introduced have often fallen short.
In the case of Meta’s newly nixed feature, it seems somewhat obvious that it would have been abused in this way.
Indeed, Byers notes that the decision to do away with the feature came “amid scrutiny from users and talent agencies, including CAA.”
AI , Instagram , Meta , social media
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission .
This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Senior Writer, TechCrunch
Lucas is a senior writer at TechCrunch, where he covers artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and startups.
He previously covered AI and cybersecurity at Gizmodo.
You can contact Lucas by emailing lucas.ropek@techcrunch.com.
Last chance to save up to $190 on TechCrunch Founder Summit.
Join 1,000+ founders and VCs at all stages for real-world scaling insights and connections that move the needle.
Savings end June 26, 11:59 p.m.
PT .
US cybersecurity agency CISA had to build its incident playbook during the incident, agency reveals
Phia accused of ‘cookie stuffing,’ taking affiliate credit on purchases it didn’t earn
Dominic-Madori Davis
Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash
Bluesky’s interim CEO, Toni Schneider, drops the ‘interim’
Apple sues OpenAI over alleged trade secret theft
Open source AI matters more than ever, according to Hugging Face’s Clem Delangue
Filing: College app Fizz accuses VC of sharing confidential startup information with rival Sidechat
Speakers
5speakers29%attributed speech346writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageDylan Byers
37 attributed words26% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.