Speaker summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City of Minneapolis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 50.7% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,049 of 26,053 speakers). This City of Minneapolis is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
City of Minneapolis

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.3%49.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 49.3%49.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 49.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos