Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video373.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Rees KC results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 963.496 faulty-reasoning hits from 373.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,198 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Rees KC is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Christopher Rees KC
Speaker details
Total words: 373.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.2% percentile
13.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos373.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos