Author summary
80%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Storey results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,313 of 6,192 authors). This Eleanor Storey is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Eleanor Storey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Eleanor Storey (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos