Speaker summary
ā 51%1 analyzed article/video255.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Green results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 1,277.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 255.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of ā 25% (21,309 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Green is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Christopher Green
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 25%Christopher Green (selected)17%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 255.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.9% percentile
16.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos255.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 55.7%55.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos