Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Davis results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 68.25 hits. Analysis detected 304 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,864 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Davis is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Davis
Speaker details
Total words: 162
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
22.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos162 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos