Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Lila results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,142.252 faulty-reasoning hits from 400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,875 of 28,364 speakers). This Christina Lila is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Christina Lila
Speaker details
Total words: 400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.8% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos400 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.7%28.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos