Speaker summary
⁠65%3 analyzed articles/videos225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Greer results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 656.068 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,634 of 28,364 speakers). This Christina Greer is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Christina Greer
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
10.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos225 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos