Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Kernaghan results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 963.742 faulty-reasoning hits from 757 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,549 of 28,364 speakers). This Chloe Kernaghan is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Chloe Kernaghan
Speaker details
Total words: 757
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.4% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos757 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos