Speaker summary
⁠56%2 analyzed articles/videos254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Fineman results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 69.92 hits. Analysis detected 225.563 faulty-reasoning hits from 254 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,997 of 28,364 speakers). This Chloe Fineman is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Chloe Fineman
Speaker details
Total words: 254
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
8.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos254 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos