Speaker summary
⁠34%4 analyzed articles/videos55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Park District results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 59 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,132 of 28,364 speakers). This Chicago Park District is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Chicago Park District
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
20.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos