Author summary
23% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rory Quealy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 766 hits . Analysis detected 7,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,701 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,895 of 6,628 authors). This Rory Quealy is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Rory Quealy
Author details
Total words: 10,701
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst