Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chesa Boudin results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,965 of 28,364 speakers). This Chesa Boudin is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Chesa Boudin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
35.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos